Skip to content
Neath Port Talbot Counts — Neath Port Talbot, in numbers.Local help →

Neath Port Talbot, in numbers

Action plan

Neath Port Talbot council area. Every figure carries its own date.

Practical proposed steps for Neath Port Talbot.

The stages explain what should happen first. They are not promised completion dates. Funding, powers and ongoing costs need to be established before a proposal is adopted.

  1. The park has completed improvements
  2. Visitor pressure needs a village-scale response
  3. Use the square beyond major events
  4. The Riverside phase still needs money
  5. Make room for homes people can afford
  6. Plan homes and care around an older population
  7. Bring support closer to people in poor health
  8. Connect local skills to local opportunities
  9. Target safety work where problems repeat
  10. Turn published plans into visible progress
  11. Target support where disadvantages overlap

Proposal

The park has completed improvements

Gnoll’s main redevelopment is confirmed complete.

Proposed response: Make the completed assets useful while stating which services remain unopened.

Evidence

Who could lead: Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Publish what can actually be used.

  2. Medium term

    Check accessibility and upkeep needs.

  3. Long term

    Monitor resident use and maintenance.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Gnoll Country Park redevelopment: Main redevelopment complete; some facilities still described as opening soon

Measure: Available facilities and unresolved defects.

Trade-off: Buildings need operating funds after construction.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Gnoll Country Park redevelopment →

Proposal

Visitor pressure needs a village-scale response

The Pontneddfechan proposal is explicitly intended to manage visitor impacts and parking.

Proposed response: Test how the plan changes residents’ everyday access.

Evidence

Who could lead: Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Record parking and pedestrian problems.

  2. Medium term

    Check the design with residents and disabled visitors.

  3. Long term

    Measure access conditions after delivered works.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Pontneddfechan visitor infrastructure: Funding secured; design and planning steps described

Measure: Blocked access, parking pressures and usable walking routes.

Trade-off: More visitor infrastructure can also attract more traffic.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Pontneddfechan visitor infrastructure →

Proposal

Use the square beyond major events

Port Talbot’s Civic Square is planned for markets, events, planting and accessible routes.

Proposed response: Design a useful everyday space alongside the theatre.

Evidence

Who could lead: Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Agree access and maintenance standards.

  2. Medium term

    Prepare a varied affordable activity programme.

  3. Long term

    Review daily use after reopening.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square: Works underway in the reviewed page; summer 2026 completion unverified

Measure: Accessible space and regular community use.

Trade-off: Events must fit with quiet everyday use.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square →

Proposal

The Riverside phase still needs money

The council makes Riverside improvements conditional on additional funding.

Proposed response: Keep that unfunded phase separate from works already underway.

Evidence

Who could lead: Neath Port Talbot County Borough Council with the named delivery partners.

  1. Short term

    Publish the funding gap and proposed scope.

  2. Medium term

    Appraise affordable delivery stages.

  3. Long term

    Report only approved and completed elements as delivered.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square: Works underway in the reviewed page; summer 2026 completion unverified

Measure: Funded scope and actual milestones.

Trade-off: Delaying a linked phase may reduce the whole scheme’s benefits.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square →

Proposal

Make room for homes people can afford

Average private rent is £690 a month (August 2026) in Neath Port Talbot council area. This is £156 lower than the Wales average for the same month. Homes rented privately ranged from 7.5% in Bryn-coch North to 24.6% in Aberavon — a gap of 17 percentage points.

Housing costs matter most alongside earnings and the number of affordable homes available. A local average cannot tell us whether a particular household can afford its home.

Who could lead: The housing and planning authorities, housing associations and developers.

  1. Start now

    Publish the local waiting list, temporary accommodation and affordable-home delivery figures together. Start by checking the different needs in Aberavon and Bryn-coch North; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test proposed housing sites against affordable-home need, access to work, school places and water capacity.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check whether completed homes reduce unmet need, rather than counting planning permissions as delivery.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Average private rent is £690 a month (August 2026) in Neath Port Talbot council area. Homes rented privately ranged from 7.5% in Bryn-coch North to 24.6% in Aberavon — a gap of 17 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 34 of 34 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Affordable homes completed, households waiting, time in temporary accommodation, and rent compared with local earnings.

Trade-off: More homes can put pressure on infrastructure and land. Affordability requirements also affect development viability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Average monthly rent →

Evidence: Average home price →

Proposal

Plan homes and care around an older population

21.2% of people in Neath Port Talbot council area were aged 65 or over (21 March 2021). People aged 65 or over ranged from 7.1% in Coedffranc West to 34.5% in Bryn-coch North — a gap of 27.4 percentage points.

Age alone does not mean poor health or a need for care. Accessible homes, reliable transport and support close to home matter as people get older.

Who could lead: Adult social care, local health services, housing providers and transport authorities.

  1. Start now

    Compare the location of older residents with access to care, shops and transport. Start by checking the different needs in Bryn-coch North and Coedffranc West; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Prioritise home adaptations and care capacity in places with the clearest unmet need.

  3. Over the longer term

    Build accessible homes and joined-up care into local development plans.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 21.2% aged 65 or over; 21 March 2021. People aged 65 or over ranged from 7.1% in Coedffranc West to 34.5% in Bryn-coch North — a gap of 27.4 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 34 of 34 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Waits for home adaptations and care, avoidable hospital stays, and accessible homes delivered.

Trade-off: Services need skilled staff and ongoing funding. Age profiles alone cannot measure unmet care need.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 65 or over →

Proposal

Bring support closer to people in poor health

8.8% of people reported bad or very bad health in Neath Port Talbot council area (21 March 2021). Across Wales, the figure was 6.9%. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 3% in Coedffranc West to 15.1% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 12.1 percentage points.

This is how residents described their health in the census. It can reveal differences between neighbourhoods, but does not diagnose illness or measure current waiting times. Age profiles differ between places, so these shares do not measure service quality.

Who could lead: Local health services, public health teams, employers and community organisations.

  1. Start now

    Use neighbourhood evidence to find where poor health and barriers to services overlap. Start by checking the different needs in Gwynfi and Croeserw and Coedffranc West; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test accessible local support and publish who is reached and who is missed.

  3. Over the longer term

    Review whether health gaps narrow, alongside housing and employment improvements.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 8.8% reporting bad or very bad health; 21 March 2021. People reporting bad or very bad health ranged from 3% in Coedffranc West to 15.1% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 12.1 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 34 of 34 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Access to services and the health gap between neighbourhoods, using comparable age-adjusted measures when available.

Trade-off: A census snapshot is dated. New service decisions also need current needs assessments and residents’ experience.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People reporting bad or very bad health →

Proposal

Connect local skills to local opportunities

25.8% of people aged 16 or over had a degree or equivalent (21 March 2021) in Neath Port Talbot council area. Across Wales, the figure was 31.5%. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 7.9% in Coedffranc West to 37.2% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 29.3 percentage points.

Qualifications show one part of the skills available locally. They do not show whether people have secure jobs or work that uses those skills.

Who could lead: Employers, colleges, universities and the relevant skills authority.

  1. Start now

    Compare vacancies and employer needs with training available to local residents. Start by checking the different needs in Gwynfi and Croeserw and Coedffranc West; census differences are not proof of unmet demand.

  2. Over the next few years

    Link training to real jobs, including routes for people without formal qualifications.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained employment and earnings after training, not just course starts.

How to judge progress

Starting point: 25.8% with a degree or equivalent; 21 March 2021. People aged 16+ with no qualifications ranged from 7.9% in Coedffranc West to 37.2% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 29.3 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 34 of 34 current wards have comparable figures.

Measure: Sustained jobs, earnings and training completion for residents who face barriers to work.

Trade-off: Training takes time and cannot create demand for jobs on its own. Qualifications are not a complete measure of ability.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent →

Evidence: People aged 16+ with no qualifications →

Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square →

Proposal

Target safety work where problems repeat

Mapped police records are available for neighbourhoods in Neath Port Talbot council area.

Published locations are approximate and some crimes are not mapped. Counts show recorded incidents, not the chance of an individual becoming a victim.

Who could lead: The local police force, council community safety team and relevant services.

  1. Start now

    Check recurring places and categories alongside local police priorities and residents’ reports.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test focused prevention and support, with a comparison period agreed before the work starts.

  3. Over the longer term

    Publish whether problems fall, move elsewhere or return, and adjust the response.

How to judge progress

Crime evidence and coverage →

Starting point: Use the dated, complete periods shown in Crime and safety; keep anti-social behaviour separate.

Measure: Comparable recorded incidents, repeat victimisation and residents’ reported experience; never a single crude league table.

Trade-off: More reporting can increase recorded crime. Enforcement and support may work differently for different problems.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Proposal

Turn published plans into visible progress

3 named local projects or plans have official evidence in this collection.

A published plan makes responsibilities and intentions easier to inspect. It does not prove that funding is secured or that promised benefits have arrived.

Who could lead: The named project owners and council scrutiny bodies.

  1. Start now

    Put the scope, owner, funding position and next milestone in one public place.

  2. Over the next few years

    Report delivery against the agreed scope and explain delays or changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Check the benefits residents actually receive after completion.

How to judge progress

Starting point: The dated stages in Projects; unknown costs and funding remain unknown.

Measure: Milestones met, costs against the approved budget, and measured outcomes after delivery.

Trade-off: Delivery reporting takes staff time, but a launch announcement alone cannot show value for money.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Gnoll Country Park redevelopment →

Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square →

Pontneddfechan visitor infrastructure →

Proposal

Target support where disadvantages overlap

Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 10.7% in Coedffranc West to 43.1% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 32.4 percentage points.

These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.

Who could lead: The council's housing, public health and employment teams, with local services.

  1. Start now

    Check current advice and support access in Gwynfi and Croeserw, using the census pattern as a starting point and asking residents what is missing.

  2. Over the next few years

    Test joined-up housing, work and health support, and publish who takes part, who cannot reach it and what changes.

  3. Over the longer term

    Track sustained outcomes and whether gaps between neighbourhoods narrow, using comparable dates and measures.

How to judge progress

Starting point: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages ranged from 10.7% in Coedffranc West to 43.1% in Gwynfi and Croeserw — a gap of 32.4 percentage points. 21 March 2021; 34 of 34 wards.

Measure: Access to support, unresolved housing problems and sustained work or health outcomes. Census percentages alone cannot measure a new programme's success.

Trade-off: Targeting neighbourhoods can miss people in need elsewhere. Avoid labelling every resident by the average for their ward.

Cost: No costed delivery assessment has been established here. These are proposed sequences, not funded promises or completion deadlines.

Evidence: Households facing two or more measured disadvantages →

Gnoll Country Park redevelopment →

Princess Royal Theatre and Civic Square →

Pontneddfechan visitor infrastructure →

From evidence to delivery